← All tribunal records
BuyTrust building report

Siena Of Portico

1428 W 6th Ave, Vancouver · Fairview

See the whole Fairview risk profile →
Risk read
Elevated · Governance & council conduct
3
decisions
20262026
span
4
issues
0/3
owner wins

What this building’s record shows

Siena Of Portico has been before the BC Civil Resolution Tribunal 3 times (20262026), surfacing 4 distinct issues across 3 categories. The dominant theme is governance & council conduct, and the highest-severity issue on record is rated elevated. Owners prevailed in 0 of 3 decisions; total awards on record: $0.

Each category below explains what that pattern means for a buyer, with the building’s own decisions as evidence.

Governance & council conduct

Elevated severity4 decisions

How the corporation is actually run — records access, meetings, bylaw enforcement, transparency. Repeated governance cases signal a contentious or opaque council, and that colours every decision made about your money and your building.

Governance Issues · 3Special Assessment · 1

Common property & use

Low severity3 decisions

Boundaries, parking, and renovation disputes — who controls and can alter shared space. Usually lower-stakes individually, but frequent cases show ongoing friction between owners and the board.

Parking Issues · 3

Building systems & safety

Elevated severity1 decision

Electrical, HVAC, elevators, and fire safety. Disputes here point to aging or contested infrastructure — confirm the status of major systems and whether any fire-safety orders are outstanding.

Electrical Systems · 1

The decisions

Every tribunal decision linked to this building, newest first.

2026 BCCRT 359
2026-03-03Decided

The owner challenged a $200 penalty imposed by the strata corporation for storing a non-functioning vehicle and connecting to strata electrical systems to charge their car battery. The dispute centered on whether the strata followed proper procedures when applying its bylaws and if the monetary penalty was appropriate.

2026-03-03Decided

An owner challenged a $200 fine from their strata corporation for allegedly parking an inoperable vehicle in their parking stall and using a strata electrical outlet for a car battery charger. The strata defended the fine as justified under their bylaws, while also arguing the claim was filed too late under limitation laws.

2026 BCCRT 359 (CanLII)
2026-03-03Decided

A dispute between a strata lot owner and their strata corporation regarding a bylaw fine imposed for using a battery charger in their parking stall, with issues around the strata's authority to enforce such fines.

Who runs this building

Firstservice Residential

Across 1,141 buildings, this manager has 304 tribunal cases on record — a dispute rate of 1.2 per 100 units. A manager’s portfolio-wide rate is a signal of how they run buildings generally, beyond this one address.

Sourced from published tribunal decisions and analysed by PropTrust. Not legal advice. Verify with the corporation and a licensed professional before purchase.