36 E 14th Ave, Vancouver · Mount Pleasant
See the whole Mount Pleasant risk profile →36 E 14th Ave has been before the BC Civil Resolution Tribunal 3 times (2021–2024), surfacing 6 distinct issues across 5 categories. The dominant theme is common property & use, and the highest-severity issue on record is rated high. Owners prevailed in 0 of 3 decisions; total awards on record: $2,753.
Each category below explains what that pattern means for a buyer, with the building’s own decisions as evidence.
Boundaries, parking, and renovation disputes — who controls and can alter shared space. Usually lower-stakes individually, but frequent cases show ongoing friction between owners and the board.
How the corporation is actually run — records access, meetings, bylaw enforcement, transparency. Repeated governance cases signal a contentious or opaque council, and that colours every decision made about your money and your building.
Water ingress, roof, and building-envelope failures are the most expensive problems a condo faces, and they’re what drive large special assessments. Structural cases on record are the strongest reason to commission an engineer’s review of the envelope.
Electrical, HVAC, elevators, and fire safety. Disputes here point to aging or contested infrastructure — confirm the status of major systems and whether any fire-safety orders are outstanding.
Noise, pets, smoking, short-term rentals. Day-to-day quality-of-life conflict — lower financial stakes, but a useful window into how neighbours and the council handle disputes.
Every tribunal decision linked to this building, newest first.
A dispute arose between a strata lot owner and the strata corporation regarding fencing and privacy screening issues at the property. The matter involved mutual claims and counter-allegations between both parties. The tribunal's final determination and awarded remedies were not fully detailed in the available documentation.
A strata corporation pursued bylaw enforcement action against a unit owner who erected a privacy fence panel. This matter connects to two additional related proceedings involving the same screening structure, though the complete resolution remains unclear from available information.
The applicant filed complaints regarding construction noise and alleged property damage from renovation work in units located above their strata lot. The tribunal determined the strata corporation inadequately addressed noise complaints and bylaw enforcement but handled property damage matters appropriately. The strata corporation was required to pay $2,753.49 including damages and fees.
Across 118 buildings, this manager has 86 tribunal cases on record — a dispute rate of 3.01 per 100 units. A manager’s portfolio-wide rate is a signal of how they run buildings generally, beyond this one address.
Sourced from published tribunal decisions and analysed by PropTrust. Not legal advice. Verify with the corporation and a licensed professional before purchase.