160 Palmdale Dr, Toronto · Tam O'Shanter-Sullivan
See the whole Tam O'Shanter-Sullivan risk profile →has been before the condominium tribunal 7 times (2022–2025), surfacing 5 distinct issues across 5 categories. The dominant theme is governance & council conduct, and the highest-severity issue on record is rated elevated. Owners prevailed in 0 of 7 decisions; total awards on record: $0.
Each category below explains what that pattern means for a buyer, with the building’s own decisions as evidence.
How the corporation is actually run — records access, meetings, bylaw enforcement, transparency. Repeated governance cases signal a contentious or opaque council, and that colours every decision made about your money and your building.
Special assessments and fee disputes hit owners directly — a single levy can run tens of thousands per unit. A pattern here means the building’s finances have been contested. Ask for the reserve-fund study and the levy history before you offer.
Electrical, HVAC, elevators, and fire safety. Disputes here point to aging or contested infrastructure — confirm the status of major systems and whether any fire-safety orders are outstanding.
Boundaries, parking, and renovation disputes — who controls and can alter shared space. Usually lower-stakes individually, but frequent cases show ongoing friction between owners and the board.
Noise, pets, smoking, short-term rentals. Day-to-day quality-of-life conflict — lower financial stakes, but a useful window into how neighbours and the council handle disputes.
Every tribunal decision linked to this building, newest first.
A condominium unit owner brought forward complaints against the condominium corporation concerning alleged harassment and intimidation by other residents, along with disputes over modifications to laundry appliances. The resolution and specific remedies awarded in this matter were not specified in the available case information.
A unit owner brought forward complaints against their condominium corporation alleging harassment and nuisance issues. The tribunal's decision lacks sufficient detail in the available text to establish what resolution or orders were made in this matter.
The applicant challenged the condominium corporation's adequacy of meeting documentation and transparency in communicating reserve fund contribution information to owners. The dispute focused on access to corporate records and disclosure of financial obligations related to reserve funding requirements.
The applicant sought to obtain invoice records from the condominium corporation. The respondent corporation refused access, asserting the documents were subject to solicitor-client privilege. The tribunal examined whether owners' rights to review financial documentation override privilege protections.
A dispute arose between a condominium corporation and the owner concerning access to personal information and maintaining confidentiality of sensitive records in tribunal proceedings. The case examined procedural measures required to protect private information during condominium-related adjudications.
A condominium corporation and a unit owner were in disagreement over a dog kept on the property. The tribunal was asked to determine matters concerning pet accommodations and adherence to the building's regulations.
An owner sought access to legal invoices from the condominium corporation, which refused disclosure. The matter centered on whether the corporation could properly invoke solicitor-client privilege to deny the owner's request for these legal billing records.
Sourced from published tribunal decisions and analysed by PropTrust. Not legal advice. Verify with the corporation and a licensed professional before purchase.