The tribunal determined that the strata corporation conducted lobby renovations without obtaining required owner approval and made spending decisions for signage and corridor painting that violated statutory expenditure limits. The strata was ordered to halt renovation work until proper voting procedures are followed and to adhere to spending restrictions.
Downtown Vancouver
Downtown Vancouver, Vancouver · Downtown Vancouver
See the whole Downtown Vancouver risk profile →What this building’s record shows
Downtown Vancouver has been before the BC Civil Resolution Tribunal 2 times (2018–2021), surfacing 5 distinct issues across 4 categories. The dominant theme is governance & council conduct, and the highest-severity issue on record is rated elevated. Owners prevailed in 0 of 2 decisions; total awards on record: $225.
Each category below explains what that pattern means for a buyer, with the building’s own decisions as evidence.
Governance & council conduct
How the corporation is actually run — records access, meetings, bylaw enforcement, transparency. Repeated governance cases signal a contentious or opaque council, and that colours every decision made about your money and your building.
Common property & use
Boundaries, parking, and renovation disputes — who controls and can alter shared space. Usually lower-stakes individually, but frequent cases show ongoing friction between owners and the board.
Livability
Noise, pets, smoking, short-term rentals. Day-to-day quality-of-life conflict — lower financial stakes, but a useful window into how neighbours and the council handle disputes.
Maintenance & upkeep
Deferred repairs and general upkeep. Minor on their own, but alongside structural cases they reinforce a picture of a building falling behind.
The decisions
Every tribunal decision linked to this building, newest first.
The strata corporation attempted to compel upstairs unit owners to install sound-dampening flooring and remit noise violation penalties totaling $5,200 following complaints from a downstairs resident beginning in 2014. The tribunal rejected the application, determining the noise evidence was insufficient and unreliable, and overturned all imposed fines.
Who runs this building
Across 1,141 buildings, this manager has 304 tribunal cases on record — a dispute rate of 1.2 per 100 units. A manager’s portfolio-wide rate is a signal of how they run buildings generally, beyond this one address.
Sourced from published tribunal decisions and analysed by PropTrust. Not legal advice. Verify with the corporation and a licensed professional before purchase.