Mayfair on the Green III
430 McLevin Ave, Toronto · Malvern East
See the whole Malvern East risk profile →What this building’s record shows
Mayfair on the Green III has been before the condominium tribunal 9 times (2018–2026), surfacing 5 distinct issues across 4 categories. The dominant theme is governance & council conduct, and the highest-severity issue on record is rated high. Owners prevailed in 0 of 9 decisions; total awards on record: $0.
Each category below explains what that pattern means for a buyer, with the building’s own decisions as evidence.
Governance & council conduct
How the corporation is actually run — records access, meetings, bylaw enforcement, transparency. Repeated governance cases signal a contentious or opaque council, and that colours every decision made about your money and your building.
Water, envelope & structural
Water ingress, roof, and building-envelope failures are the most expensive problems a condo faces, and they’re what drive large special assessments. Structural cases on record are the strongest reason to commission an engineer’s review of the envelope.
Common property & use
Boundaries, parking, and renovation disputes — who controls and can alter shared space. Usually lower-stakes individually, but frequent cases show ongoing friction between owners and the board.
Maintenance & upkeep
Deferred repairs and general upkeep. Minor on their own, but alongside structural cases they reinforce a picture of a building falling behind.
The decisions
Every tribunal decision linked to this building, newest first.
This tribunal decision cannot be properly analyzed as the available document contains only header information and case metadata without the actual decision content, findings, or orders made by the tribunal.
A disagreement arose concerning how the condominium corporation managed requests for accessing records pertaining to mortgage holders. The tribunal addressed matters of document availability and the corporation's duties for maintaining and providing records, with the matter reaching resolution.
A condominium owner brought a dispute against the Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation concerning proportionate share obligations and seeking reimbursement for legal expenses. The tribunal excerpt lacks sufficient information to determine the final decision or specific remedies granted in this matter.
A condominium unit owner filed a complaint against their condominium corporation concerning communication matters, requests for document access, and issues related to share closures. The tribunal's complete decision and findings are not available in the provided case materials.
A unit owner sought access to corporate financial records, statements, and tender documentation from their condominium corporation. The matter centered on transparency obligations and the owner's right to examine corporate books and bidding processes.
The applicant requested access to condominium corporation documents. The tribunal determined that the requested records should be made available with proper redactions applied. The matter was settled when both parties reached an understanding regarding the terms for document disclosure.
A dispute arose concerning documentation of receipts and proper record maintenance at a Toronto condominium property. The tribunal reopened proceedings due to issues with the documentation provided, though the final outcome is not specified in the available decision materials.
The applicant filed a dispute with the condominium corporation concerning maintenance responsibilities for sealant work and building exterior repairs. The case involved questions about contractual obligations related to the building envelope maintenance. The specific resolution and awarded remedies are not available without the complete decision details.
Who runs this building
Across 9 buildings, this manager has 17 tribunal cases on record — a dispute rate of 1.72 per 100 units. A manager’s portfolio-wide rate is a signal of how they run buildings generally, beyond this one address.
Sourced from published tribunal decisions and analysed by PropTrust. Not legal advice. Verify with the corporation and a licensed professional before purchase.