The applicant owned two strata lots and sought $16,228 for repairs after building envelope work from 2019-2021, alleging inadequate restoration. The tribunal rejected the claims, determining the strata corporation properly followed engineering guidance and wasn't liable for unauthorized modifications. The strata's counter-application for costs also failed.
Fiona Court
1345 Burnaby St, Vancouver · West End
See the whole West End risk profile →What this building’s record shows
Fiona Court has been before the BC Civil Resolution Tribunal 2 times (2020–2023), surfacing 8 distinct issues across 5 categories. The dominant theme is water, envelope & structural, and the highest-severity issue on record is rated high. Owners prevailed in 0 of 2 decisions; total awards on record: $521.
Each category below explains what that pattern means for a buyer, with the building’s own decisions as evidence.
Water, envelope & structural
Water ingress, roof, and building-envelope failures are the most expensive problems a condo faces, and they’re what drive large special assessments. Structural cases on record are the strongest reason to commission an engineer’s review of the envelope.
Common property & use
Boundaries, parking, and renovation disputes — who controls and can alter shared space. Usually lower-stakes individually, but frequent cases show ongoing friction between owners and the board.
Financial disputes & fees
Special assessments and fee disputes hit owners directly — a single levy can run tens of thousands per unit. A pattern here means the building’s finances have been contested. Ask for the reserve-fund study and the levy history before you offer.
Governance & council conduct
How the corporation is actually run — records access, meetings, bylaw enforcement, transparency. Repeated governance cases signal a contentious or opaque council, and that colours every decision made about your money and your building.
Maintenance & upkeep
Deferred repairs and general upkeep. Minor on their own, but alongside structural cases they reinforce a picture of a building falling behind.
The decisions
Every tribunal decision linked to this building, newest first.
The strata corporation claimed $3,471.34 in legal expenses after the owner defaulted on a special levy payment and a lien was registered. The tribunal awarded only $478.43 plus interest and costs for $520.55 total, finding most legal costs inadequately documented and not proven necessary.
Who runs this building
Across 26 buildings, this manager has 7 tribunal cases on record — a dispute rate of 3.08 per 100 units. A manager’s portfolio-wide rate is a signal of how they run buildings generally, beyond this one address.
Sourced from published tribunal decisions and analysed by PropTrust. Not legal advice. Verify with the corporation and a licensed professional before purchase.