← All tribunal records
BuyTrust building report

Fiona Court

1345 Burnaby St, Vancouver · West End

See the whole West End risk profile →
Risk read
High · Water, envelope & structural
2
decisions
20202023
span
8
issues
0/2
owner wins

What this building’s record shows

Fiona Court has been before the BC Civil Resolution Tribunal 2 times (20202023), surfacing 8 distinct issues across 5 categories. The dominant theme is water, envelope & structural, and the highest-severity issue on record is rated high. Owners prevailed in 0 of 2 decisions; total awards on record: $521.

Each category below explains what that pattern means for a buyer, with the building’s own decisions as evidence.

Water, envelope & structural

High severity3 decisions

Water ingress, roof, and building-envelope failures are the most expensive problems a condo faces, and they’re what drive large special assessments. Structural cases on record are the strongest reason to commission an engineer’s review of the envelope.

Construction Defects · 1Roof Envelope · 1Water Damage · 1

Common property & use

Elevated severity2 decisions

Boundaries, parking, and renovation disputes — who controls and can alter shared space. Usually lower-stakes individually, but frequent cases show ongoing friction between owners and the board.

Boundary Issues · 1Renovation/Alteration · 1

Financial disputes & fees

Elevated severity1 decision

Special assessments and fee disputes hit owners directly — a single levy can run tens of thousands per unit. A pattern here means the building’s finances have been contested. Ask for the reserve-fund study and the levy history before you offer.

Condo Fees · 1

Governance & council conduct

Elevated severity1 decision

How the corporation is actually run — records access, meetings, bylaw enforcement, transparency. Repeated governance cases signal a contentious or opaque council, and that colours every decision made about your money and your building.

Special Assessment · 1

Maintenance & upkeep

Low severity1 decision

Deferred repairs and general upkeep. Minor on their own, but alongside structural cases they reinforce a picture of a building falling behind.

Maintenance Deficiency · 1

The decisions

Every tribunal decision linked to this building, newest first.

2023 BCCRT 435
2023-05-25Split decision

The applicant owned two strata lots and sought $16,228 for repairs after building envelope work from 2019-2021, alleging inadequate restoration. The tribunal rejected the claims, determining the strata corporation properly followed engineering guidance and wasn't liable for unauthorized modifications. The strata's counter-application for costs also failed.

2020 BCCRT 562
2020-05-22Split decision$521

The strata corporation claimed $3,471.34 in legal expenses after the owner defaulted on a special levy payment and a lien was registered. The tribunal awarded only $478.43 plus interest and costs for $520.55 total, finding most legal costs inadequately documented and not proven necessary.

Who runs this building

Fort Park Property Management

Across 26 buildings, this manager has 7 tribunal cases on record — a dispute rate of 3.08 per 100 units. A manager’s portfolio-wide rate is a signal of how they run buildings generally, beyond this one address.

Sourced from published tribunal decisions and analysed by PropTrust. Not legal advice. Verify with the corporation and a licensed professional before purchase.