← All tribunal records
BuyTrust building report

345 W 16th Ave

345 W 16th Ave, Vancouver · Mount Pleasant

See the whole Mount Pleasant risk profile →
Risk read
High · Governance & council conduct
1
decisions
20192019
span
6
issues
0/1
owner wins

What this building’s record shows

345 W 16th Ave has been before the BC Civil Resolution Tribunal 1 times (20192019), surfacing 6 distinct issues across 5 categories. The dominant theme is governance & council conduct, and the highest-severity issue on record is rated high. Owners prevailed in 0 of 1 decisions; total awards on record: $0.

Each category below explains what that pattern means for a buyer, with the building’s own decisions as evidence.

Governance & council conduct

Elevated severity2 decisions

How the corporation is actually run — records access, meetings, bylaw enforcement, transparency. Repeated governance cases signal a contentious or opaque council, and that colours every decision made about your money and your building.

Governance Issues · 1Insurance Issues · 1

Financial disputes & fees

Elevated severity1 decision

Special assessments and fee disputes hit owners directly — a single levy can run tens of thousands per unit. A pattern here means the building’s finances have been contested. Ask for the reserve-fund study and the levy history before you offer.

Reserve Fund · 1

Water, envelope & structural

High severity1 decision

Water ingress, roof, and building-envelope failures are the most expensive problems a condo faces, and they’re what drive large special assessments. Structural cases on record are the strongest reason to commission an engineer’s review of the envelope.

Roof Envelope · 1

Common property & use

Low severity1 decision

Boundaries, parking, and renovation disputes — who controls and can alter shared space. Usually lower-stakes individually, but frequent cases show ongoing friction between owners and the board.

Parking Issues · 1

Maintenance & upkeep

Low severity1 decision

Deferred repairs and general upkeep. Minor on their own, but alongside structural cases they reinforce a picture of a building falling behind.

Maintenance Deficiency · 1

The decisions

Every tribunal decision linked to this building, newest first.

2019 BCCRT 419
2019-04-16Split decision

Owners in a two-unit strata development had ongoing disagreements over necessary common area maintenance including roofing, walkways, and exterior painting, plus insurance matters. The tribunal required the strata corporation to engage a property manager to handle the repairs and insurance assessment, with expenses divided equally between the owners.

Who runs this building

Firstservice Residential

Across 1,141 buildings, this manager has 304 tribunal cases on record — a dispute rate of 1.2 per 100 units. A manager’s portfolio-wide rate is a signal of how they run buildings generally, beyond this one address.

Sourced from published tribunal decisions and analysed by PropTrust. Not legal advice. Verify with the corporation and a licensed professional before purchase.