Mtcc 1136, Toronto · Birch Cliff
See the whole Birch Cliff risk profile →Mtcc 1136 has been before the condominium tribunal 8 times (2019–2025), surfacing 1 distinct issues across 1 category. The dominant theme is governance & council conduct, and the highest-severity issue on record is rated elevated. Owners prevailed in 0 of 8 decisions; total awards on record: $0.
Each category below explains what that pattern means for a buyer, with the building’s own decisions as evidence.
How the corporation is actually run — records access, meetings, bylaw enforcement, transparency. Repeated governance cases signal a contentious or opaque council, and that colours every decision made about your money and your building.
Every tribunal decision linked to this building, newest first.
The applicant sought access to specific documents from the condominium corporation. The tribunal evaluated the corporation's duty to provide requested records and determined which materials the applicant was legally entitled to receive under the governing legislation.
A dispute arose regarding a condominium corporation's application to recover costs from the owner. The tribunal assessed whether the corporation's costs recovery application was submitted for inappropriate reasons rather than legitimate purposes.
A property owner brought forward concerns against their condominium corporation relating to billing documentation and project application procedures. The tribunal addressed matters involving potentially vexatious behavior and submission processes, though specific details of the underlying conflict were not fully outlined in available materials.
An owner requested access to condominium corporation records and disputed procedural requirements for tribunal filing. The tribunal ruled against the owner, determining that the corporation's access procedures complied with applicable regulations and no valid grounds for relief existed.
The applicant challenged the condominium corporation's compliance with statutory record-keeping requirements and alleged vexatious behavior. The tribunal assessed whether the corporation properly maintained documentation and meeting minutes in accordance with condominium legislation.
A condominium-related dispute was brought before the tribunal concerning certificate issues, penalty assessments, procedural errors, and questions around timing requirements. The available case excerpt lacks sufficient detail to determine the specific circumstances or final resolution of the matter.
Case outcome cannot be established as the available decision document lacks substantive content regarding the nature of the dispute, tribunal findings, or any relief granted. Only administrative metadata was accessible for review.
The applicant sought access to documentation concerning a gas contract renewal that the condominium corporation had authorized through email correspondence. The tribunal assessed the corporation's duty to maintain and provide copies of communications and materials relating to contractual approvals.
Across 129 buildings, this manager has 51 tribunal cases on record — a dispute rate of 0.53 per 100 units. A manager’s portfolio-wide rate is a signal of how they run buildings generally, beyond this one address.
Sourced from published tribunal decisions and analysed by PropTrust. Not legal advice. Verify with the corporation and a licensed professional before purchase.