8111 Yonge St, Markham · The Annex
See the whole The Annex risk profile →The Gazebo has been before the condominium tribunal 6 times (2019–2025), surfacing 2 distinct issues across 2 categories. The dominant theme is governance & council conduct, and the highest-severity issue on record is rated elevated. Owners prevailed in 1 of 6 decisions; total awards on record: $0.
Each category below explains what that pattern means for a buyer, with the building’s own decisions as evidence.
How the corporation is actually run — records access, meetings, bylaw enforcement, transparency. Repeated governance cases signal a contentious or opaque council, and that colours every decision made about your money and your building.
Special assessments and fee disputes hit owners directly — a single levy can run tens of thousands per unit. A pattern here means the building’s finances have been contested. Ask for the reserve-fund study and the levy history before you offer.
Every tribunal decision linked to this building, newest first.
A property owner brought forward concerns against York Condominium Corporation No. 344 that could not be settled through discussion. The tribunal provided mediation services to help resolve the disagreement, though the particular matters at issue and final resolution details are not specified in the available documentation.
A dispute arose at York Condominium Corporation No. 344 concerning communication protocols and the sharing of information. The complete details of the tribunal's decision and resolution are not available in the provided case materials.
The applicant challenged the condominium corporation's handling of reserve fund documentation and studies. The tribunal assessed whether proper maintenance and disclosure of reserve fund records to unit owners had occurred according to statutory requirements.
The applicant and the condominium corporation resolved their disagreement through settlement concerning the proper protocols for scheduling and notifying residents about board meetings. The dispute centered on the corporation's methods for conducting meetings and providing adequate communication to unit owners.
The applicant challenged York Condominium Corporation No. 344's management of proxy voting materials. The tribunal's decision focused on proper procedures for proxy document administration within the condominium corporation.
The tribunal determined that York Condominium Corporation No. 344 did not deliver mandatory condominium documentation to the owner within statutory deadlines. The corporation received an order to fulfill records disclosure requirements and was assessed a financial penalty for non-compliance.
Across 138 buildings, this manager has 24 tribunal cases on record — a dispute rate of 0.48 per 100 units. A manager’s portfolio-wide rate is a signal of how they run buildings generally, beyond this one address.
Sourced from published tribunal decisions and analysed by PropTrust. Not legal advice. Verify with the corporation and a licensed professional before purchase.