← All tribunal records
BuyTrust building report

Pleasant View Manor

350 E 5th Ave, Vancouver · Mount Pleasant

See the whole Mount Pleasant risk profile →
Risk read
High · Water, envelope & structural
1
decisions
20182018
span
5
issues
0/1
owner wins

What this building’s record shows

Pleasant View Manor has been before the BC Civil Resolution Tribunal 1 times (20182018), surfacing 5 distinct issues across 4 categories. The dominant theme is water, envelope & structural, and the highest-severity issue on record is rated high. Owners prevailed in 0 of 1 decisions; total awards on record: $0.

Each category below explains what that pattern means for a buyer, with the building’s own decisions as evidence.

Water, envelope & structural

High severity2 decisions

Water ingress, roof, and building-envelope failures are the most expensive problems a condo faces, and they’re what drive large special assessments. Structural cases on record are the strongest reason to commission an engineer’s review of the envelope.

Water Damage · 1Windows & Doors · 1

Governance & council conduct

Elevated severity1 decision

How the corporation is actually run — records access, meetings, bylaw enforcement, transparency. Repeated governance cases signal a contentious or opaque council, and that colours every decision made about your money and your building.

Governance Issues · 1

Common property & use

Elevated severity1 decision

Boundaries, parking, and renovation disputes — who controls and can alter shared space. Usually lower-stakes individually, but frequent cases show ongoing friction between owners and the board.

Boundary Issues · 1

Maintenance & upkeep

Low severity1 decision

Deferred repairs and general upkeep. Minor on their own, but alongside structural cases they reinforce a picture of a building falling behind.

Maintenance Deficiency · 1

The decisions

Every tribunal decision linked to this building, newest first.

2018 BCCRT 165
2018-05-02Corporation upheld

A strata corporation claimed $7,350 from a strata lot owner for water damage repairs to patio elements. The tribunal rejected the claim, determining the strata failed to demonstrate the owner's liability for the repairs and couldn't prove relevant bylaws were properly registered.

Who runs this building

Fort Park Property Management

Across 26 buildings, this manager has 7 tribunal cases on record — a dispute rate of 3.08 per 100 units. A manager’s portfolio-wide rate is a signal of how they run buildings generally, beyond this one address.

Sourced from published tribunal decisions and analysed by PropTrust. Not legal advice. Verify with the corporation and a licensed professional before purchase.